Docket of Current Cases

Cases are arranged alphabetically. To find a particular case, location or topic, use our search feature. You can use any search term, or multiple search terms to narrow the focus of the search.

You can also print out our list of currently-active cases.

Search our cases:

 


Page 2 of 5 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

Grant County Tyrone mine closure plan [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Silver City/ Grant County


Issues:

Ensure future remediation and bonding of Phelps Dodge mine (5th largest open pit mine in U.S.) in Grant County.



Latest News:

03/06/2009 - Freeport McMoRan filed an appeal to the decision from the Water Quality Control Commission to uphold the groundwater discharge permit requirements.

01/13/2009 - After four years of litigation, including an excursion to the NM Court of Appeals and a year of “executive session” deliberations by the NM Water Quality Control Commission, the Commission issued its decision on January 13th, 2009 regarding the groundwater discharge permit that the Environment Department (NMED) issued in 2005 to Phelps Dodge Mining Co., now Freeport McMoRan.  The decision is significant for the protection of New Mexico’s groundwater.

The permit requires that the company clean up its extensive and deep groundwater pollution, which spans two aquifers.  Two of the permit conditions require the company to regrade and cover all of the exposed tailings, waste rock and ore at the site, encompassing nearly 10,000 acres of land. After the permit was issued, Phelps Dodge sued over those permit conditions. Although it did not dispute that the piles will continue to be sources of groundwater contamination for centuries to come, the company argued that it had the right to pollute the groundwater beneath its property. 

The Commission made several important determinations that rejected the arguments presented by the company and its numerous experts.  Most importantly, the Commission stated unequivocally that land ownership and control of the land surface are not relevant to determining whether groundwater will be used in the future.  Instead, it directed the NM Environment Dept. to only consider objective factors such as aquifer characteristics, present use of water, pre-mining water quality, and reasonably foreseeable use of the groundwater at issue over a time horizon of at least the next 100 years.

Case Initiation Date:
2001


Clients/Partners:
Gila Resources Information Project (GRIP)


Attorneys:
Bruce Frederick


Case Status:
On-going - The NM Water Quality Control Commission directed NMED to determine which parts of the aquifers underlying the mines are “places of withdrawal” where water quality standards must be met. NMED must make this determination and reevaluate the permit conditions in light of its determination within 18 months.


Back to top

Haaku Water Office uranium negotiations [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Acoma Pueblo and surrounding lands


Issues:

Represent Haaku Water Office in government-to-government negotiations concerning new uranium mining permits near Acoma Pueblo and on or near Mt. Taylor.



Latest News:

06/05/2009 - Mount Taylor was permanently listed in the State Register of Cultural Properties by the Cultural Properties Review Committee. To view the final nomination, a map showing the guardian peaks used to establish the TCP boundaries and other related materials, please visit the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division website.

Case Initiation Date:
July 2007


Clients/Partners:
Haaku Water Office of Acoma Pueblo


Attorneys:
Eric Jantz


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Homestake Discharge Permit 725 [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Milan


Issues:

Represent BVDA at public hearing concerning modification and renewal of groundwater discharge permit DP-725 for Homestake uranium mine.



Latest News:

01/19/2010 - “Nearby residents oppose permit, Homestake still seeking renewal” Cibola Beacon Read full article.

12/18/2009 - NMELC filed expert testimony in the matter of the discharge permit (DP-725) for the Homestake uranium tailings reclamation superfund site.  A public hearing will be held to determine if the permit will be approved as issued or modified.

Case Initiation Date:
October 2009


Clients/Partners:
Bluewater Valley Downstream Alliance (BVDA)


Attorneys:
Jonathan Block, Eric Jantz


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Hydro Resources, Inc. uranium mines [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Church Rock, Crownpoint


Issues:

Appearing in proceedings before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to stop the operation of an in-situ leach uranium mining operation that will contaminate the sole drinking water source for 15,000 Navajo citizens.  Federal appeal of license filed in February, 2006.

This case marks the first time that a community has sued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) over the issuance of an in situ leach (ISL) uranium mining license.  This case also marks the first time that the NRC has issued a license for mining in a high-quality drinking water aquifer, despite the fact that no ISL mines have ever been reclaimed to pre-mining condition.  (In fact, the Crow Butte mine in Nebraska, which the NRC has described as a “model reclamation” in the past, was fined $1 million in July 2008 for groundwater contamination.)



Latest News:

05/18/2010 - The 10th Federal Circuit Appeals Court denies request for En Banc Rehearing.

04/22/2010 - Law Center files Petition for Panel or En Banc Rehearing to the 10th Federal Circuit Appeals Court.

03/08/2010 - The 10th Federal Circuit Appeals Court in Denver, CO returned with their decision upholding the NRC license allowing HRI to mine for uranium in Crownpoint’s municipal water supply.

05/12/2008 - Oral arguments are heard in 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, CO. Currently we are waiting to hear judges decision.

Case Initiation Date:
September 1996


Clients/Partners:
Eastern Diné Against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) and the Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC)


Attorneys:
Eric Jantz


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Knowles dairies' State Engineer process [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Knowles


Issues:

Assist clients in protecting groundwater from contamination by major dairies.



Latest News:
Case Initiation Date:
September 2009


Clients/Partners:
individuals


Attorneys:
Jonathan Block


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Knowles dairy NMED groundater discharge permit [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Knowles


Issues:

Represent clients in proceeding where dairies are appealing state-mandated groundwater contamination mitigation plans.



Latest News:
Case Initiation Date:
November 2009


Clients/Partners:
individuals


Attorneys:
Jonathan Block


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Los Alamos National Laboratory Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Discharge Permit [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Los Alamos


Issues:

Representing client in state proceedings concerning Discharge Permit 1132 for the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility.



Latest News:
Case Initiation Date:
June 2005


Clients/Partners:
Amigos Bravos


Attorneys:
Douglas Meiklejohn


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Lost Creek ISL Mine (proposed) [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Wyoming (west)


Issues:

Comment on Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) issued by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for Lost Creek. SEIS utilizes the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS).



Latest News:

03/04/2010 - Law Center files comments on the SEIS that was issued by the NRC.

Case Initiation Date:
December 2009


Clients/Partners:
Southwest Research and Information Center


Attorneys:
Eric Jantz


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Moore Ranch ISL Mine (proposed) [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Wyoming (east)


Issues:

Comment on Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) issued by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for Moor Ranch. SEIS utilizes the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS).



Latest News:

03/04/2010 - Law Center files comments on the SEIS that was issued by the NRC.

Case Initiation Date:
December 2009


Clients/Partners:
Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC)


Attorneys:
Eric Jantz


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top

Mora County oil and gas drilling [Click to view entire case file.]
Location:
Mora County


Issues:

Working with clients to prevent oil and gas drilling that would be detrimental to human health, and environmental and cultural resources in Mora County, the 17th poorest county in the U.S.



Latest News:

09/25/2009 - “Who has more say in Mora County? Citizens or Shell?“ from Drilling Santa Fe Blog.

09/01/2009 - The Law Center has submitted comments on he Comprehensive Land Use Plan.

07/31/2009 - Currently working to see if it will be possible to adapt the Santa Fe County’s drilling ordinance to Mora County.

Case Initiation Date:
February 2008


Clients/Partners:
Drilling Mora


Attorneys:
Bruce Frederick


Case Status:
On-going


Back to top