On October 17, NMELC and the Multicultural Alliance for a Safe Environment (MASE) submitted comments highly critical of proposed changes to New Mexico Groundwater and Surface Water Quality regulations. “The proposed changes would potentially allow increased contamination of
ground water throughout the state, possibly in perpetuity, and would eliminate the Water Quality Act’s (“WQA” or “Act”) public notice and participation requirements in the permitting process,” penned Staff Attorney Jaimie Park in response to the New Mexico Environment Department’s (NMED’s) second round of draft regulations. Check out all of NMED’s attempts to weaken public participation and relax standards (including barium, chromium, xylenes and vinyl chloride) in our comments: 161017_NMELC_MASE_2nd_comments_NMED_water_reg_amendments.pdf
The comment period on these proposed changes ends today (October 17) at 5pm. We anticipate that NMED will petition the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission to consider these amendments in 2017. We will keep you posted.
10/17/2016 • Back to top
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) is in the process of revising statewide surface water and groundwater regulations for the state - October 17 marks the deadline for the round of public comments on a second draft. This draft failed to address any of the substantive concerns voiced during the first comment period by NMELC, concerned citizens, or other water-protection groups around the state. We’ve flagged some significant problems with how the Martinez Administration is trying to strip provisions for public participation and streamline the permitting process for polluters.
Deadline: 5pm MDT, Monday, October 17
Read NMED’s proposed changes here: https://www.env.nm.gov/gwb/
Read NMED’s “Hit List” for regulation changes.
Staff Attorney Jaimie Park is heading NMELC’s effort to submit a second round of comments on Monday. You can read our comments on the last draft here (our concerns remain in this draft); find out more, including aa good synopsis of the issues and a sample letter, at the website of our client and ally, Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety. Thank you!
10/14/2016 • Back to top
Even the overflow seating was filled to capacity in the state Supreme Court for the hearing of oral arguments on the Copper Rule on September 28th. The argument was dense, focused on the technical workings of copper mines. Former NMELC Staff Attorney Bruce Frederick, who volunteered to see this case through to its conclusion, offered arguments on behalf of our clients Amigos Bravos, Gila Resources Information Project and Turner Ranch Properties.
Our primary concern is new mines: under the Copper Rule, Bruce explained, these mines would be able to pollute pristine groundwater that might otherwise provide drinking water for New Mexican communities. Check out our Q&A about the Copper Rule.
10/06/2016 • Back to top
By Allyson Siwik, Executive Director of the Gila Resources Information Project, Silver City, NM.
In a second round of proposed changes to surface water and groundwater quality regulations, the NM Environment Department (NMED) has put forth additional language to weaken water quality safeguards for the benefit of polluters and limit opportunities for public participation in permitting processes.
The new language relaxes the water quality standard for chromium and despite public comment in opposition, would continue to allow industry to obtain variances from water quality regulations for an unlimited duration rather than for a five-year period as currently mandated by the state’s Water Quality Act.
10/06/2016 • Back to top
[L]ack of specific language in the bill drew attention from both opponents to the rule and the justices themselves. Justice Barbara Vigil at several times in the hearing asked supporters of the rule, “Is this not overly broad?” To a wider degree, opponents disagree with the rule’s validity as a whole in the authority it holds beneath the umbrella of the Water Quality Act.
Meiklejohn said that the rule is counterintuitive to the act. “The Water Quality Act states that any regulations that are adopted must be adopted to prevent or abate groundwater pollution,” he said. “The New Mexico Copper Rule does not prevent or abate; it allows.” Silver City Daily Press
Go to Silver City Daily Press for full story.
10/01/2016 • Back to top
The firm plans to drill 37 wells across the ranch property and pump 54,000 acre-feet of water annually — or 48 million gallons each day — which would be pumped, using hydroelectric and solar power, to areas in Catron, Santa Fe, Bernalillo, Sandoval, Socorro and Valencia counties through a 141-mile pipeline…The initial application also was met with opposition from tribal groups, local communities and the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, which represented at least 80 people protesting the project.
Doug Meiklejohn, director of the nonprofit law center, told The New Mexican in August that he expects at least that many people to protest the current application. Santa Fe New Mexican
Go to Santa Fe New Mexican for full story.
09/30/2016 • Back to top